92
Annual Report
2013
recommendation as stated in the meeting notice,
the meeting Chairman allocated appropriate,
sufficient and equal time for discussions that would
encourage the meeting attendants to ask questions
for the Board of Directors and the Management to
clarify for full understanding on related matters. The
meeting Chairman then asked the meeting to vote.
•
Director appointment and remuneration
approval:
Thedirector appointment and remuneration
are treated as two different agendas and are voted
separately. Individual vote was arranged for new
director appointment.
•
In each agenda,
the Company provided
ballots for each shareholder. A computerized system
was used to provide convenience for vote counting.
•
Meeting resolution announcement:
After
the vote counts, the meeting Chairman reported
voting results by dividing into “agree”, “disagree”
and “abstention” votes.
•
Consideration of other agenda (if any):
The
Board of Directors allowed for other agendas (if any)
in order to provide opportunities for the shareholders
to propose additional issue other than those set in the
meeting agenda. According to the Company’s Articles
of Association, to propose a new agenda for the
shareholders’ meeting to consider, the shareholders
who propose the new agenda must represent no
less than one third of the sold stocks. In the 2013
ordinary shareholders’ meeting, no other agenda was
proposed for voting. Only recommendations and
questions about the Company’s operations were
raised as recorded in the meeting report.
•
Meeting resolutiondistribution:
TheCompany
submitted to the SET the result of the 2013 annual
general shareholders’meeting, including voting results
of each agenda which specified in detail the agree,
disagree and abstention votes, and their percentage.
The results were documented and submitted to the
SET by post and through the SET’s ELCID before 9.00
hrs. of 29 March 2013 (the next working day after the
meeting date).
•
Meeting report:
Corporate Secretary Office,
as assigned by the Chairman of the Board of
Directors, recorded and prepared meeting reports in
writing by clearly and adequately recording essence
of each agenda, questions by the shareholders
and clarifications by the Board of Directors and
Management, the recommendation fromthemeeting,
and themeeting resolutions, including detailed voting
results in all categories. The Company submitted
the complete report signed by the chairman of the
meeting to SET, SEC and the Registrar (theDepartment
of Business Development) for auditing and reference.
The report was published on the Company’s website
on 5 April 2013, before the 14-day deadline required
by law, to offer opportunities for shareholders to
express their opinions without waiting for the next
meeting. Shareholders did not ask the Company to
amend, add or adjust the report.
•
Meeting quality improvement:
The Company
arranged a meeting evaluation form to collect
opinions and recommendations from the meeting
attendees on themeeting invitationandannual report,
facilitation to the shareholders, meeting arrangement
andmeeting report. The information collected is used
for further improving the arrangement of shareholders
meeting in order to ensure transparency, efficiency
and benefits to both the Company and shareholders.
The Company received scoring of 100
points and recognized as “Excellence and Good
Example” for the fifth consecutive year in the Thai
Investors Association’ Annual General Shareholders
Meeting ranking of its ordinary shareholders’ meeting
assessment in 2013.
1.6 Right to Receive Information and
Significant Information in Accurate,
Sufficient and Timely Manner
In 2013, the Company completely followed
the regulations, criteria, conditions and procedure
related to disclosure of information and activities
of listed companies. There was no punishment due
to failure to submit report by deadline as required
by law. The Company recognizes the importance
of significant information disclosure and its Board of
Directors and the Management have continuously
